Xeon w3-2525 vs Celeron M 320

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 320 and Xeon w3-2525 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release dateno data24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$609

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 320 and Xeon w3-2525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Threads116
Base clock speed1.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache512 KB L2 Cache22.5 MB
Chip lithography130 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 320 and Xeon w3-2525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketH-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)24.5 Watt175 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 320 and Xeon w3-2525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron M 320 and Xeon w3-2525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 320 and Xeon w3-2525 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 320 and Xeon w3-2525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 320 and Xeon w3-2525.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 175 Watt

Celeron M 320 has 629.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon w3-2525, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 320 and Xeon w3-2525. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 320 is a notebook processor while Xeon w3-2525 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 320 and Xeon w3-2525, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 320
Celeron M 320
Intel Xeon w3-2525
Xeon w3-2525

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w3-2525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 320 or Xeon w3-2525, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.