Xeon 6972P vs Celeron M 320

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 320 and Xeon 6972P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Granite Rapids (2024)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 320 and Xeon 6972P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)96
Threads1192
Base clock speed1.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache512 KB L2 Cache480 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 320 and Xeon 6972P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketH-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA4787529
Power consumption (TDP)24.5 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 320 and Xeon 6972P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 320 and Xeon 6972P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 320 and Xeon 6972P are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 320 and Xeon 6972P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 320 and Xeon 6972P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data96

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 96
Threads 1 192
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 500 Watt

Celeron M 320 has 1983.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6972P, on the other hand, has 9500% more physical cores and 19100% more threads, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 320 and Xeon 6972P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 320 is a notebook processor while Xeon 6972P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 320 and Xeon 6972P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 320
Celeron M 320
Intel Xeon 6972P
Xeon 6972P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6972P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 320 or Xeon 6972P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.