E2-6110 vs Celeron M 320
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 320 and E2-6110 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 2694 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Celeron M | AMD E-Series |
Power efficiency | no data | 4.46 |
Architecture codename | Banias (2003) | Beema (2014) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 320 and E2-6110 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
L2 cache | no data | 2048 KB |
L3 cache | 512 KB L2 Cache | no data |
Chip lithography | 130 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 1.356V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 320 and E2-6110 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478 | FT3b |
Power consumption (TDP) | 24.5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 320 and E2-6110. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | FMA4 |
AVX | - | + |
PowerNow | - | + |
PowerGating | - | + |
VirusProtect | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 320 and E2-6110 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 320 and E2-6110 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | - | no data |
IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 320 and E2-6110. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-1600 |
Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics |
Enduro | - | + |
Switchable graphics | - | + |
UVD | - | + |
VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 320 and E2-6110 integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron M 320 and E2-6110 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 320 and E2-6110.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
Threads | 1 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 130 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 24 Watt | 15 Watt |
E2-6110 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 320 and E2-6110. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 320 and E2-6110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.