E2-6110 vs Celeron M 320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 320 and E2-6110 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2694
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MAMD E-Series
Power efficiencyno data4.46
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Beema (2014)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 320 and E2-6110 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L2 cacheno data2048 KB
L3 cache512 KB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography130 nm28 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 320 and E2-6110 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketH-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)24.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 320 and E2-6110. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 320 and E2-6110 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 320 and E2-6110 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 320 and E2-6110. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 320 and E2-6110 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron M 320 and E2-6110 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 320 and E2-6110.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 15 Watt

E2-6110 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 320 and E2-6110. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 320 and E2-6110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 320
Celeron M 320
AMD E2-6110
E2-6110

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 135 votes

Rate E2-6110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 320 or E2-6110, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.