Ryzen 7 3750H vs Celeron M 310

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 7 3750H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	1198
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Celeron M	AMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency	no data	13.78
Architecture codename	Banias (2003)	Picasso (Zen+) (2019)
Release date	no data (2024 years ago)	6 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 7 3750H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	1	8
Base clock speed	1.2 GHz	2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.2 GHz	4 GHz
Bus type	no data	PCIe 3.0
Bus rate	400 MHz	no data
Multiplier	no data	23
L1 cache	no data	384 KB
L2 cache	no data	2 MB
L3 cache	512 KB L2	4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	130 nm	12 nm
Die size	no data	209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	105 °C
Number of transistors	no data	4940 Million
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
VID voltage range	1.356V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 7 3750H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	H-PBGA479, PPGA478	FP5
Power consumption (TDP)	24.5 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 7 3750H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 7 3750H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 7 3750H are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-x	-	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 7 3750H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	no data	DDR4
Maximum memory size	no data	64 GB
Max memory channels	no data	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon RX Vega 10

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 7 3750H.

PCIe version	no data	3.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	12

Pros & cons summary

---

Physical cores	1	4
Threads	1	8
Chip lithography	130 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	24 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 310 and Ryzen 7 3750H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---