Atom E3815 vs Celeron J4125

Place in the ranking	1998	3364
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.55	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	Atom
Power efficiency	17.60	2.27
Architecture codename	Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)	Bay Trail-I (2013)
Release date	4 November 2019 (5 years ago)	8 October 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$107	$134

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4125 and Atom E3815 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	4	1
Base clock speed	2 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.7 GHz	1.47 GHz
L1 cache	56 KB (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	4 MB (shared)	512 KB (per core)
L3 cache	4 MB	0 KB
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Die size	93 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4125 and Atom E3815 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1090	Intel BGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4125 and Atom E3815. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Smart Response	-	no data
GPIO	+	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron J4125 and Atom E3815 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
MPX	+	-
Identity Protection	+	-
SGX	Yes with Intel® ME	no data
OS Guard	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4125 and Atom E3815 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4125 and Atom E3815. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4	DDR3
Maximum memory size	8 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel UHD Graphics 600	Intel HD Graphics
Max video memory	8 GB	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Graphics max frequency	750 MHz	no data
Execution Units	12	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4125 and Atom E3815 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	no data
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-
MIPI-DSI	+	no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4125 and Atom E3815 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support	+	no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4	4096x2160@30Hz	no data
Max resolution over eDP	4096x2160@60Hz	no data
Max resolution over DisplayPort	4096x2160@60Hz	no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4125 and Atom E3815 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	12	no data
OpenGL	4.4	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4125 and Atom E3815.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	6	no data
USB revision	2.0/3.0	no data
Total number of SATA ports	2	no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports	2	no data
Number of USB ports	8	no data
Integrated LAN	-	no data
UART	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4125 1.86
+1450%

Atom E3815 0.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4125 2957
+1507%

Atom E3815 184

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.86	0.12
Integrated graphics card	0.87	0.77
Recency	4 November 2019	8 October 2013
Physical cores	4	1
Threads	4	1
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	5 Watt

Celeron J4125 has a 1450% higher aggregate performance score, 13% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Atom E3815, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The Celeron J4125 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom E3815 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4125 is a desktop processor while Atom E3815 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4125 and Atom E3815, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.