Celeron N5105 vs J4115

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4115
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.69
Celeron N5105
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
2.55
+50.9%

Celeron N5105 outperforms Celeron J4115 by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4115 and Celeron N5105 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20611748
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Gemini Lakeno data
Power efficiency15.9824.12
Architecture codenameGemini Lake (2019)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4115 and Celeron N5105 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.9 GHz
L2 cache4 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4115 and Celeron N5105 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4115 and Celeron N5105. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response--
GPIO++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--

Security technologies

Celeron J4115 and Celeron N5105 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4115 and Celeron N5105 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4115 and Celeron N5105. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel UHD Graphics
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency750 MHz800 MHz
Execution Units1224

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4115 and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4115 and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4115 and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.44.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4115 and Celeron N5105.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes68
USB revision2.0/3.02.0/3.2
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports22
Number of USB ports814
Integrated LAN--
UART++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4115 1.69
Celeron N5105 2.55
+50.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4115 2687
Celeron N5105 4055
+50.9%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron J4115 244
Celeron N5105 368
+50.8%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron J4115 71
Celeron N5105 108
+53.1%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron J4115 1421
Celeron N5105 2080
+46.4%

Blender(-)

Celeron J4115 2515
+59.9%
Celeron N5105 1573

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron J4115 399
Celeron N5105 653
+63.7%

7-Zip Single

Celeron J4115 2200
Celeron N5105 3108
+41.3%

7-Zip

Celeron J4115 7614
Celeron N5105 11153
+46.5%

WebXPRT 3

Celeron J4115 82
Celeron N5105 134
+64.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 2.55
Integrated graphics card 0.87 5.58
Recency 4 November 2019 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

Celeron N5105 has a 50.9% higher aggregate performance score, 541.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron N5105 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4115 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4115 and Celeron N5105, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4115
Celeron J4115
Intel Celeron N5105
Celeron N5105

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 135 votes

Rate Celeron J4115 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 701 vote

Rate Celeron N5105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4115 or Celeron N5105, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.