Celeron N3350E vs J4105

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4105 and Celeron N3350E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1963not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.45no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)no data
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)1 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4105 and Celeron N3350E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads42
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache4 MB (shared)no data
L3 cache4 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size93 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4105 and Celeron N3350E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1090no data
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron N3350E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response--
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Smart Idleno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron J4105 and Celeron N3350E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron N3350E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron N3350E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel HD Graphics 500
Max video memory8 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency750 MHz650 MHz
Execution Units1212

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4105 and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12+
OpenGL4.4+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4105 and Celeron N3350E.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes66
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 0.87 0.77
Recency 11 December 2017 1 July 2019
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron J4105 has 13% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more threads.

Celeron N3350E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J4105 and Celeron N3350E. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron J4105 is a desktop processor while Celeron N3350E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4105 and Celeron N3350E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4105
Celeron J4105
Intel Celeron N3350E
Celeron N3350E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 299 votes

Rate Celeron J4105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 5 votes

Rate Celeron N3350E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4105 or Celeron N3350E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.