Processor N95 vs Celeron J3355
Aggregate performance score
Processor N95 outperforms Celeron J3355 by a whopping 303% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J3355 and Processor N95 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 2604 | 1596 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.02 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Alder Lake-N |
Architecture codename | Apollo Lake (2016) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
Release date | 30 August 2016 (8 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron J3355 and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | no data |
Multiplier | 20 | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 105 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J3355 and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1296 | BGA1264 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3355 and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Smart Response | - | no data |
GPIO | + | no data |
Smart Connect | - | no data |
Status | Launched | no data |
HD Audio | + | no data |
RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron J3355 and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Boot | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
OS Guard | - | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3355 and Processor N95 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
VT-i | - | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3355 and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 500 | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 700 MHz | no data |
Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3355 and Processor N95 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron J3355 and Processor N95 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | + | no data |
OpenGL | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3355 and Processor N95.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 6 | 9 |
USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 8 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.77 | 3.10 |
Integrated graphics card | 0.77 | 2.30 |
Recency | 30 August 2016 | 3 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
Celeron J3355 has 50% lower power consumption.
Processor N95, on the other hand, has a 302.6% higher aggregate performance score, 198.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
The Processor N95 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3355 in performance tests.
Note that Celeron J3355 is a desktop processor while Processor N95 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3355 and Processor N95, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.