Ryzen 9 3900X vs Celeron J1900

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1900
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.75
Ryzen 9 3900X
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
21.31
+2741%

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Celeron J1900 by a whopping 2741% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 9 3900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2675269
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.81
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency6.8418.51
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$82$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 9 3900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.42 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache224 KB768 KB
L2 cache2 MB6 MB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache64 MB
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 9 3900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170AM4
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 9 3900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 9 3900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 9 3900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 9 3900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series-
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency854 MHz-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 9 3900X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 9 3900X.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1900 0.75
Ryzen 9 3900X 21.31
+2741%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1900 1151
Ryzen 9 3900X 32619
+2734%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J1900 173
Ryzen 9 3900X 1710
+888%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J1900 515
Ryzen 9 3900X 9950
+1832%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 21.31
Recency 1 November 2013 7 July 2019
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 105 Watt

Celeron J1900 has 950% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 3900X, on the other hand, has a 2741.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 3900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron J1900 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 3900X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 9 3900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 195 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 5125 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1900 or Ryzen 9 3900X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.