Xeon w9-3495X vs Celeron J1800

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1800 and Xeon w9-3495X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated21
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.82
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiencyno data15.65
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1800 and Xeon w9-3495X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Threads2112
Base clock speed2.41 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache112 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache105 MB
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1800 and Xeon w9-3495X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and Xeon w9-3495X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI-no data
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron J1800 and Xeon w9-3495X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and Xeon w9-3495X are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and Xeon w9-3495X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size8 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and Xeon w9-3495X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and Xeon w9-3495X.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes4112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1800 573
Xeon w9-3495X 91936
+15945%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 15 February 2023
Physical cores 2 56
Threads 2 112
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 350 Watt

Celeron J1800 has 3400% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3495X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and 2700% more physical cores and 5500% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1800 and Xeon w9-3495X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron J1800 is a notebook processor while Xeon w9-3495X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and Xeon w9-3495X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon w9-3495X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 534 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 176 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1800 or Xeon w9-3495X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.