Xeon Silver 4316 vs Celeron J1800
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Silver 4316 outperforms Celeron J1800 by a whopping 5381% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J1800 and Xeon Silver 4316 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3050 | 290 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.40 | 12.44 |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-D (2013) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | 1 November 2013 (11 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $72 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron J1800 and Xeon Silver 4316 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 40 |
| Base clock speed | 2.41 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.58 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 112 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 30 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 84 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J1800 and Xeon Silver 4316 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and Xeon Silver 4316. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
| FDI | - | no data |
| RST | - | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron J1800 and Xeon Silver 4316 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and Xeon Silver 4316 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and Xeon Silver 4316. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2667 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 6 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 792 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and Xeon Silver 4316 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and Xeon Silver 4316.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.36 | 19.73 |
| Recency | 1 November 2013 | 6 April 2021 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 20 |
| Threads | 2 | 40 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 150 Watt |
Celeron J1800 has 1400% lower power consumption.
Xeon Silver 4316, on the other hand, has a 5380.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.
The Xeon Silver 4316 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1800 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron J1800 is a notebook processor while Xeon Silver 4316 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and Xeon Silver 4316, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
