Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs Celeron J1800
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J1800 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 64 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 16.33 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Power efficiency | no data | 13.43 |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-D (2013) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 1 November 2013 (11 years ago) | 25 November 2019 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $72 | $1,999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron J1800 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 2.41 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.58 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 8 × 16 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 37 |
| L1 cache | 112 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 19,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J1800 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
| FDI | - | no data |
| RST | - | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron J1800 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 102.403 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series | - |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 792 MHz | - |
| InTru 3D | - | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 November 2013 | 25 November 2019 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 32 |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 280 Watt |
Celeron J1800 has 2700% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron J1800 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron J1800 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
