Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) vs Celeron J1800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1800 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Kentsfield (2007)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)23 July 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72$266

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1800 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.41 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache112 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB8 MB (shared)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data2x 143 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data62 °C
Number of transistorsno data582 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1800 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170775
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1800 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W).

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes4no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 23 July 2007
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 95 Watt

Celeron J1800 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 850% lower power consumption.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W), on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1800 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron J1800 is a notebook processor while Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)
Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 534 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 426 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1800 or Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.