Ryzen 5 3600 vs Celeron J1750

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1750
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.37
Ryzen 5 3600
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
11.17
+2919%

Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Celeron J1750 by a whopping 2919% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 3600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3019693
Place by popularitynot in top-1009
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data22.04
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency3.5016.26
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed2.41 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.41 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache112 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170AM4
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 3600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series-
Graphics max frequency750 MHz-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 3600 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 3600.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1750 0.37
Ryzen 5 3600 11.17
+2919%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1750 595
Ryzen 5 3600 17746
+2883%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.37 11.17
Recency 1 September 2013 7 July 2019
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron J1750 has 550% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 3600, on the other hand, has a 2918.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 3600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1750 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron J1750 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 3600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1750 and Ryzen 5 3600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 17331 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1750 or Ryzen 5 3600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.