E1 Micro-6200T vs Celeron J1750

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	AMD E-Series
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Mullins (2014)
Release date	1 September 2013 (11 years ago)	29 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$72	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	2.41 GHz	1 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.41 GHz	1.4 GHz
L1 cache	112 KB	no data
L2 cache	1 MB	1024 KB
L3 cache	1 MB L2 Cache	no data
Chip lithography	22 nm	28 nm
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	FCBGA1170	FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	3.95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI	-	+
FMA	-	FMA4
AVX	-	+
PowerNow	-	+
PowerGating	-	+
VirusProtect	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
PAE	36 Bit	no data
FDI	-	no data
RST	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data
IOMMU 2.0	-	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum memory size	8 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series	AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Enduro	-	+
Switchable graphics	-	+
UVD	-	+
VCE	-	+
Graphics max frequency	750 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	2	no data
DisplayPort	-	+
HDMI	-	+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	no data	DirectX® 12
Vulkan	-	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T.

PCIe version	2.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	4	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 September 2013	29 April 2014
Chip lithography	22 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	3 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---