i5-11400F vs Celeron J1750

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1750 and Core i5-11400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated722
Place by popularitynot in top-10038
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.60
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiencyno data15.59
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72$157

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1750 and Core i5-11400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed2.41 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.41 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache112 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data276 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1750 and Core i5-11400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1750 and Core i5-11400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI-no data
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron J1750 and Core i5-11400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1750 and Core i5-11400F are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1750 and Core i5-11400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data50 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1750 and Core i5-11400F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1750 and Core i5-11400F.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1750 595
i5-11400F 17011
+2759%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2013 16 March 2021
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron J1750 has 550% lower power consumption.

i5-11400F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1750 and Core i5-11400F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron J1750 is a notebook processor while Core i5-11400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1750 and Core i5-11400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750
Intel Core i5-11400F
Core i5-11400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 8720 votes

Rate Core i5-11400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1750 or Core i5-11400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.