Celeron J3060 vs J1750

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1750 and Celeron J3060 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Airmont (2016)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)15 January 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72$107

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1750 and Celeron J3060 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.41 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.41 GHz2.48 GHz
Bus typeno dataIDI
L1 cache112 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1750 and Celeron J3060 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1750 and Celeron J3060. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
PAE36 Bitno data
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
FDI-no data
HD Audiono data+
RST--

Security technologies

Celeron J1750 and Celeron J3060 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1750 and Celeron J3060 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1750 and Celeron J3060. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency750 MHz700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1750 and Celeron J3060 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J1750 and Celeron J3060 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1750 and Celeron J3060.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes44
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data5
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1750 595
Celeron J3060 679
+14.1%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2013 15 January 2016
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron J3060 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1750 and Celeron J3060. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron J1750 is a notebook processor while Celeron J3060 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1750 and Celeron J3060, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750
Intel Celeron J3060
Celeron J3060

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 135 votes

Rate Celeron J3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1750 or Celeron J3060, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.