Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Celeron G6900TE

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G6900TE
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.55
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
17.49
+1028%

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS outperforms Celeron G6900TE by a whopping 1028% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G6900TE and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2141381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency4.0456.96
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-S (2022)Hawk Point (2024)
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron G6900TE and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G6900TE and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1700FP7
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G6900TE and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron G6900TE and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G6900TE and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G6900TE and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 710AMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G6900TE and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G6900TE 1.55
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS 17.49
+1028%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G6900TE 2373
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS 26767
+1028%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 17.49
Integrated graphics card 2.85 18.28
Recency 4 January 2022 16 April 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a 1028.4% higher aggregate performance score, 541.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G6900TE in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G6900TE is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G6900TE and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G6900TE
Celeron G6900TE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 9 votes

Rate Celeron G6900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G6900TE or Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.