Celeron 4305UE vs G6900TE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G6900TE
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.49
+39.3%
Celeron 4305UE
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.07

Celeron G6900TE outperforms Celeron 4305UE by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G6900TE and Celeron 4305UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21592426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency4.036.75
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-S (2022)Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)1 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Celeron G6900TE and Celeron 4305UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G6900TE and Celeron 4305UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1700Intel BGA 1528
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G6900TE and Celeron 4305UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX+-

Security technologies

Celeron G6900TE and Celeron 4305UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G6900TE and Celeron 4305UE are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G6900TE and Celeron 4305UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 710Intel UHD Graphics 610

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G6900TE and Celeron 4305UE.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G6900TE 1.49
+39.3%
Celeron 4305UE 1.07

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G6900TE 2373
+39.7%
Celeron 4305UE 1699

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.49 1.07
Integrated graphics card 2.85 1.89
Recency 4 January 2022 1 October 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron G6900TE has a 39.3% higher aggregate performance score, 50.8% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 3 years.

Celeron 4305UE, on the other hand, has 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G6900TE is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 4305UE in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G6900TE is a desktop processor while Celeron 4305UE is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G6900TE and Celeron 4305UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G6900TE
Celeron G6900TE
Intel Celeron 4305UE
Celeron 4305UE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 9 votes

Rate Celeron G6900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 4305UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G6900TE or Celeron 4305UE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.