Apple M4 Max (14 cores) vs Celeron G6900TE
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G6900TE and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2156 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple M4 |
| Power efficiency | 4.01 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-S (2022) | no data |
| Release date | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) | 30 November 2024 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron G6900TE and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 4.51 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G6900TE and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 1700 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G6900TE and Apple M4 Max (14 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron G6900TE and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G6900TE and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G6900TE and Apple M4 Max (14 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | Apple M4 32-core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G6900TE and Apple M4 Max (14 cores).
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2022 | 30 November 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 14 |
| Threads | 2 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 80 Watt |
Celeron G6900TE has 128.6% lower power consumption.
Apple M4 Max (14 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron G6900TE and Apple M4 Max (14 cores). We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron G6900TE is a desktop processor while Apple M4 Max (14 cores) is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G6900TE and Apple M4 Max (14 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
