7 150UL vs Celeron G6900E

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G6900E and Core 7 150UL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-S (2022)Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron G6900E and Core 7 150UL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed3 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G6900E and Core 7 150UL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket17001700
Power consumption (TDP)46 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G6900E and Core 7 150UL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++

Security technologies

Celeron G6900E and Core 7 150UL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G6900E and Core 7 150UL are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G6900E and Core 7 150UL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 710Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G6900E and Core 7 150UL.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2022 8 April 2024
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 2 12
Power consumption (TDP) 46 Watt 15 Watt

7 150UL has an age advantage of 2 years, 400% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and 206.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G6900E and Core 7 150UL. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G6900E and Core 7 150UL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G6900E
Celeron G6900E
Intel Core 7 150UL
Core 7 150UL

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 7 votes

Rate Celeron G6900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 7 150UL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G6900E or Core 7 150UL, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.