Athlon 3000G vs Celeron G4900T

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G4900T
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.44
Athlon 3000G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.88
+100%

Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron G4900T by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G4900T and Athlon 3000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22011670
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.805.27
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Athlon
Power efficiency3.827.64
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date2 April 2018 (6 years ago)7 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$49

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G4900T has 10% better value for money than Athlon 3000G.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G4900T and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0PCIe 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2935
L1 cache128 KB192 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size126 mm2209.78 mm2?
Maximum core temperature88 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G4900T and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G4900T and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron G4900T and Athlon 3000G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G4900T and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G4900T and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB?
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 610AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G4900T and Athlon 3000G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G4900T and Athlon 3000G integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G4900T and Athlon 3000G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G4900T and Athlon 3000G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes166

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G4900T 1.44
Athlon 3000G 2.88
+100%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G4900T 2239
Athlon 3000G 4482
+100%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G4900T 546
Athlon 3000G 956
+75.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G4900T 922
Athlon 3000G 1958
+112%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.44 2.88
Integrated graphics card 1.89 2.98
Recency 2 April 2018 7 November 2019
Threads 2 4

Athlon 3000G has a 100% higher aggregate performance score, 57.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more threads.

The Athlon 3000G is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G4900T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G4900T and Athlon 3000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G4900T
Celeron G4900T
AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7 votes

Rate Celeron G4900T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2078 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G4900T or Athlon 3000G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.