Athlon XP-M 2200+ vs Celeron G460
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G460 and Athlon XP-M 2200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3105 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | AMD Athlon XP-M |
Power efficiency | 0.81 | no data |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Barton (2001−2004) |
Release date | 12 December 2011 (12 years ago) | 19 July 2004 (20 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $65 | $97 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron G460 and Athlon XP-M 2200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.67 GHz |
Bus type | no data | FSB |
Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 266 MT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 12.5 |
L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 1.5 MB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
Die size | 131 mm2 | 101 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 66 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 504 million | 54 Million |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G460 and Athlon XP-M 2200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1155 | A |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 27 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G460 and Athlon XP-M 2200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
PowerNow | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron G460 and Athlon XP-M 2200+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G460 and Athlon XP-M 2200+ are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G460 and Athlon XP-M 2200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 17 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G460 and Athlon XP-M 2200+ integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G460 and Athlon XP-M 2200+.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 12 December 2011 | 19 July 2004 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 27 Watt |
Celeron G460 has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon XP-M 2200+, on the other hand, has 29.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron G460 and Athlon XP-M 2200+. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron G460 is a desktop processor while Athlon XP-M 2200+ is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G460 and Athlon XP-M 2200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.