Ryzen 7 2700 vs Celeron G3950

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3950
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.47
Ryzen 7 2700
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.92
+575%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron G3950 by a whopping 575% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3950 and Ryzen 7 2700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2161776
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.838.47
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency2.7214.38
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$52$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 2700 has 199% better value for money than Celeron G3950.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3950 and Ryzen 7 2700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed3 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3032
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3950 and Ryzen 7 2700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151AM4
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3950 and Ryzen 7 2700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron G3950 and Ryzen 7 2700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3950 and Ryzen 7 2700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3950 and Ryzen 7 2700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610-
Max video memory64 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz-
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3950 and Ryzen 7 2700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3950 and Ryzen 7 2700 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+-
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz-
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz-
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3950 and Ryzen 7 2700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12-
OpenGL4.4-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3950 and Ryzen 7 2700.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3950 1.47
Ryzen 7 2700 9.92
+575%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3950 2322
Ryzen 7 2700 15701
+576%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.47 9.92
Recency 3 January 2017 19 April 2018
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron G3950 has 27.5% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 2700, on the other hand, has a 574.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 2700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3950 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3950 and Ryzen 7 2700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3950
Celeron G3950
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Ryzen 7 2700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3087 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3950 or Ryzen 7 2700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.