Ultra 7 265KF vs Celeron G3950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3950
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.46
Core Ultra 7 265KF
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
36.96
+2432%

Core Ultra 7 265KF outperforms Celeron G3950 by a whopping 2432% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3950 and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking217891
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.8397.37
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency2.7127.98
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$52$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 7 265KF has 3341% better value for money than Celeron G3950.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3950 and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speed3 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3950 and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA11511851
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3950 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron G3950 and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3950 and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3950 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610N/A
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3950 and Core Ultra 7 265KF integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3950 and Core Ultra 7 265KF integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3950 and Core Ultra 7 265KF integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3950 and Core Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3950 1.46
Ultra 7 265KF 36.96
+2432%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3950 2322
Ultra 7 265KF 58717
+2429%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.46 36.96
Recency 3 January 2017 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 20
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron G3950 has 145.1% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265KF, on the other hand, has a 2431.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 265KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3950 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3950 and Core Ultra 7 265KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3950
Celeron G3950
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 46 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3950 or Core Ultra 7 265KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.