Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Celeron G3902E
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G3902E and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Strix Point (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 2 January 2016 (9 years ago) | January 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron G3902E and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 16 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 98.57 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1750 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G3902E and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3902E and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3902E and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3902E and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | LPDDR3-1866 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 510 | AMD Radeon 890M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3902E and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 1.61 | 21.69 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 28 Watt |
Celeron G3902E has 12% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, on the other hand, has 1247.2% faster integrated GPU, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron G3902E and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3902E and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
