Ryzen 5 7545U vs Celeron G3902E
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G3902E and Ryzen 5 7545U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
Release date | 2 January 2016 (8 years ago) | 2 November 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron G3902E and Ryzen 5 7545U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 12 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 16 | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 2 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | 98.57 mm2 | 137 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | 1750 Million | 20,900 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G3902E and Ryzen 5 7545U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | no data | FP7 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3902E and Ryzen 5 7545U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3902E and Ryzen 5 7545U are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3902E and Ryzen 5 7545U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | LPDDR3-1866 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 510 | AMD Radeon 740M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3902E and Ryzen 5 7545U.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 14 |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 1.61 | 8.33 |
Recency | 2 January 2016 | 2 November 2023 |
Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
Threads | 2 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 28 Watt |
Celeron G3902E has 12% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 7545U, on the other hand, has 417.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron G3902E and Ryzen 5 7545U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3902E and Ryzen 5 7545U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.