E-300 vs Celeron G3900TE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900TE
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.16
+452%

Celeron G3900TE outperforms E-300 by a whopping 452% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900TE and E-300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23613199
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.35no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD E-Series
Power efficiency3.141.10
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date19 October 2015 (9 years ago)22 August 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900TE and E-300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm40 nm
Die size98.57 mm275 mm2
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900TE and E-300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketLGA-1151FT1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900TE and E-300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SVM
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900TE and E-300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900TE and E-300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 510AMD Radeon HD 6310

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900TE and E-300.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3900TE 1.16
+452%
E-300 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3900TE 1850
+446%
E-300 339

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.16 0.21
Integrated graphics card 1.61 0.32
Recency 19 October 2015 22 August 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

Celeron G3900TE has a 452.4% higher aggregate performance score, 403.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

E-300, on the other hand, has 94.4% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G3900TE is our recommended choice as it beats the E-300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900TE and E-300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900TE
Celeron G3900TE
AMD E-300
E-300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G3900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 303 votes

Rate E-300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900TE or E-300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.