Celeron G3900TE vs Turion II Ultra M620

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion II Ultra M620
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.53
Celeron G3900TE
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.21
+128%

Celeron G3900TE outperforms Turion II Ultra M620 by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion II Ultra M620 and Celeron G3900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28592356
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.35
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Turion II UltraIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.383.15
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)19 October 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Turion II Ultra M620 and Celeron G3900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate3600 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data23
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data98.57 mm2
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion II Ultra M620 and Celeron G3900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSocket S1 (s1g3) 638-pinLGA-1151
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Ultra M620 and Celeron G3900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II Ultra M620 and Celeron G3900TE are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II Ultra M620 and Celeron G3900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3L-1600
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 510

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II Ultra M620 and Celeron G3900TE.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion II Ultra M620 0.53
Celeron G3900TE 1.21
+128%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion II Ultra M620 814
Celeron G3900TE 1850
+127%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 1.21
Recency 10 September 2009 19 October 2015
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm

Celeron G3900TE has a 128.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron G3900TE is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II Ultra M620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II Ultra M620 and Celeron G3900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II Ultra M620
Turion II Ultra M620
Intel Celeron G3900TE
Celeron G3900TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 29 votes

Rate Turion II Ultra M620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G3900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II Ultra M620 or Celeron G3900TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.