Celeron G3900TE vs A10-7400P

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7400P
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.32
+13.8%
Celeron G3900TE
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.16

A10-7400P outperforms Celeron G3900TE by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7400P and Celeron G3900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22512361
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.35
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriIntel Celeron
Power efficiency3.573.14
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)19 October 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-7400P and Celeron G3900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data23
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size245 mm298.57 mm2
Maximum core temperature102 °Cno data
Number of transistors2410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-7400P and Celeron G3900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP3LGA-1151
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7400P and Celeron G3900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7400P and Celeron G3900TE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7400P and Celeron G3900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 510
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7400P and Celeron G3900TE integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7400P and Celeron G3900TE integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7400P and Celeron G3900TE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7400P 1.32
+13.8%
Celeron G3900TE 1.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7400P 2100
+13.5%
Celeron G3900TE 1850

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.32 1.16
Recency 4 June 2014 19 October 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

A10-7400P has a 13.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron G3900TE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The A10-7400P is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900TE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7400P and Celeron G3900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7400P
A10-7400P
Intel Celeron G3900TE
Celeron G3900TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 11 votes

Rate A10-7400P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G3900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7400P or Celeron G3900TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.