Xeon Platinum 8558 vs Celeron G3900E
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G3900E and Xeon Platinum 8558 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2276 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.12 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.47 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| Release date | 2 January 2016 (8 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $4,650 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron G3900E and Xeon Platinum 8558 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 24 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 260 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 98.57 mm2 | 2x 763 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 78 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1750 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G3900E and Xeon Platinum 8558 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 |
| Socket | no data | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 330 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900E and Xeon Platinum 8558. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron G3900E and Xeon Platinum 8558 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900E and Xeon Platinum 8558 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900E and Xeon Platinum 8558. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | LPDDR3-1866 | DDR5 @ 5200 MT/s (1 DPC) |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 510 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900E and Xeon Platinum 8558.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 January 2016 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 48 |
| Threads | 2 | 96 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 330 Watt |
Celeron G3900E has 842.9% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8558, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron G3900E and Xeon Platinum 8558. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron G3900E is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8558 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900E and Xeon Platinum 8558, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
