Ryzen Embedded 8645HS vs Celeron G3900E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900E and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2291not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency3.46no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Hawk Point (2024)
Release date2 January 2016 (8 years ago)2 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900E and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size98.57 mm2178 mm2
Number of transistors1750 Million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900E and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFP8
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 510AMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 1.61 14.90
Recency 2 January 2016 2 April 2024
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron G3900E has 28.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Embedded 8645HS, on the other hand, has 825.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G3900E and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron G3900E is a notebook processor while Ryzen Embedded 8645HS is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900E and Ryzen Embedded 8645HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900E
Celeron G3900E
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS
Ryzen Embedded 8645HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Embedded 8645HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900E or Ryzen Embedded 8645HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.