Ryzen 9 3950X vs Celeron G3900E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900E
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.28
Ryzen 9 3950X
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 105 Watt
24.38
+1805%

Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Celeron G3900E by a whopping 1805% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900E and Ryzen 9 3950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2291210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1818.78
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency3.4621.97
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date2 January 2016 (8 years ago)14 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 3950X has 10333% better value for money than Celeron G3900E.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900E and Ryzen 9 3950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB64 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size98.57 mm22 x 72 mm + 125 mm (IO-Die) mm2
Number of transistors1750 Million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900E and Ryzen 9 3950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataAM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen 9 3950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen 9 3950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen 9 3950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 510-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen 9 3950X.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3900E 1.28
Ryzen 9 3950X 24.38
+1805%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3900E 2034
Ryzen 9 3950X 38720
+1804%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.28 24.38
Recency 2 January 2016 14 November 2019
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 105 Watt

Celeron G3900E has 200% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 3950X, on the other hand, has a 1804.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 3950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900E in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron G3900E is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 3950X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900E and Ryzen 9 3950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900E
Celeron G3900E
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Ryzen 9 3950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 728 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900E or Ryzen 9 3950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.