EPYC Embedded 8434P vs Celeron G3900E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900E and EPYC Embedded 8434P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2292not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency3.46no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date2 January 2016 (8 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900E and EPYC Embedded 8434P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads296
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size98.57 mm24x 73 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors1750 Million35,500 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900E and EPYC Embedded 8434P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataSP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900E and EPYC Embedded 8434P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900E and EPYC Embedded 8434P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900E and EPYC Embedded 8434P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 510N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900E and EPYC Embedded 8434P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1696

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 January 2016 1 October 2024
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 2 96
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 200 Watt

Celeron G3900E has 471.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 8434P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G3900E and EPYC Embedded 8434P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron G3900E is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 8434P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900E and EPYC Embedded 8434P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900E
Celeron G3900E
AMD EPYC Embedded 8434P
EPYC Embedded 8434P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 8434P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900E or EPYC Embedded 8434P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.