Athlon 3000G vs Celeron G3900E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900E
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.28
Athlon 3000G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.82
+120%

Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron G3900E by a whopping 120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900E and Athlon 3000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22781672
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.125.27
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Athlon
Power efficiency3.467.63
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date2 January 2016 (8 years ago)21 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$49

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon 3000G has 4292% better value for money than Celeron G3900E.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900E and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0PCIe 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2435
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size98.57 mm2209.78 mm2?
Number of transistors1750 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900E and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataAM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900E and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900E and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900E and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB?
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 510AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900E and Athlon 3000G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes166

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3900E 1.28
Athlon 3000G 2.82
+120%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3900E 2034
Athlon 3000G 4484
+120%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.28 2.82
Integrated graphics card 1.61 2.98
Recency 2 January 2016 21 November 2019
Threads 2 4

Athlon 3000G has a 120.3% higher aggregate performance score, 85.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, and 100% more threads.

The Athlon 3000G is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900E in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron G3900E is a notebook processor while Athlon 3000G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900E and Athlon 3000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900E
Celeron G3900E
AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2097 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900E or Athlon 3000G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.