i3-7167U vs Celeron G1610

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1610
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 55 Watt
0.96
Core i3-7167U
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 28 Watt
2.12
+121%

Core i3-7167U outperforms Celeron G1610 by a whopping 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1610 and Core i3-7167U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24941861
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency1.657.17
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date3 December 2012 (11 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$388$304

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1610 and Core i3-7167U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rate5 GT/s4 GT/s
Multiplierno data28
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)3 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size94 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1610 and Core i3-7167U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155BGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1610 and Core i3-7167U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
eDRAMno data64 MB
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data+

Security technologies

Celeron G1610 and Core i3-7167U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key-+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1610 and Core i3-7167U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1610 and Core i3-7167U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1 GHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1610 and Core i3-7167U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G1610 and Core i3-7167U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G1610 and Core i3-7167U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1610 and Core i3-7167U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1610 0.96
i3-7167U 2.12
+121%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1610 1519
i3-7167U 3368
+122%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 2.12
Recency 3 December 2012 3 January 2017
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 28 Watt

i3-7167U has a 120.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 96.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-7167U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1610 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G1610 is a desktop processor while Core i3-7167U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1610 and Core i3-7167U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1610
Celeron G1610
Intel Core i3-7167U
Core i3-7167U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 235 votes

Rate Celeron G1610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 8 votes

Rate Core i3-7167U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1610 or Core i3-7167U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.