i5-13600K vs Solo T1200

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-13600K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated210
Place by popularitynot in top-1006
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data58.54
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCore SoloIntel Core i5
Power efficiencyno data12.47
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$319

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-13600K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads120
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache64 KB768 KB
L2 cache2 MB8 MB
L3 cache0 KB24 MB
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size90 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors151 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-13600K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket479FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt125 W, 181 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-13600K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-13600K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-13600K are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-13600K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.604 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.5 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-13600K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-13600K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-13600K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-13600K.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Solo T1200 116
i5-13600K 2.52
+4503%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 14
Threads 1 20
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 125 Watt

Solo T1200 has 363% lower power consumption.

i5-13600K, on the other hand, has 1300% more physical cores and 1900% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-13600K. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core Solo T1200 is a notebook processor while Core i5-13600K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1200 and Core i5-13600K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo T1200
Core Solo T1200
Intel Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate Core Solo T1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2047 votes

Rate Core i5-13600K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Solo T1200 or Core i5-13600K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.