EPYC 9475F vs Celeron G1101

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1101 and EPYC 9475F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2717not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.97no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.89no data
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Turin (2024)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$85$7,592

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1101 and EPYC 9475F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads296
Base clock speed2.26 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed0.27 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size81 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors382 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1101 and EPYC 9475F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1156SP5
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1101 and EPYC 9475F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron G1101 and EPYC 9475F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1101 and EPYC 9475F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1101 and EPYC 9475F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HDN/A

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1101 and EPYC 9475F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1101 and EPYC 9475F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 2 96
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 400 Watt

Celeron G1101 has 447.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9475F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G1101 and EPYC 9475F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron G1101 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9475F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1101 and EPYC 9475F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1101
Celeron G1101
AMD EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9475F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G1101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9475F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1101 or EPYC 9475F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.