Ultra 9 288V vs Celeron G1101

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1101
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 73 Watt
0.70
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 30 Watt
12.54
+1691%

Core Ultra 9 288V outperforms Celeron G1101 by a whopping 1691% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2717618
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.97no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency0.8938.82
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$85no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.26 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed0.27 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors382 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HDArc 140V

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes14

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1101 0.70
Ultra 9 288V 12.54
+1691%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1101 1086
Ultra 9 288V 19542
+1699%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 12.54
Recency 7 January 2010 24 September 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 30 Watt

Ultra 9 288V has a 1691.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 966.7% more advanced lithography process, and 143.3% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 9 288V is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1101 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G1101 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 9 288V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1101
Celeron G1101
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G1101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 10 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1101 or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.