Ultra 5 245KF vs Celeron G1101

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1101
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 73 Watt
0.68
Core Ultra 5 245KF
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
27.54
+3950%

Core Ultra 5 245KF outperforms Celeron G1101 by a whopping 3950% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 5 245KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2730176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.9781.94
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.8820.74
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$85$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 5 245KF has 8347% better value for money than Celeron G1101.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 5 245KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads214
Base clock speed2.26 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.27 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size81 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors382 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 5 245KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA11561851
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 5 245KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 5 245KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 5 245KF are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 5 245KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HDN/A

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 5 245KF integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 5 245KF.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes120

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1101 0.68
Ultra 5 245KF 27.54
+3950%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1101 1086
Ultra 5 245KF 43751
+3929%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 27.54
Recency 7 January 2010 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 14
Threads 2 14
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron G1101 has 71.2% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 245KF, on the other hand, has a 3950% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 966.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 5 245KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1101 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1101 and Core Ultra 5 245KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1101
Celeron G1101
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
Core Ultra 5 245KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G1101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1101 or Core Ultra 5 245KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.