EPYC Embedded 8434P vs Celeron E3300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3300 and EPYC Embedded 8434P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2877not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.83no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.73no data
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date30 August 2009 (15 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3300 and EPYC Embedded 8434P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads296
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm5 nm
Die size82 mm24x 73 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors228 million35,500 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3300 and EPYC Embedded 8434P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775SP6
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3300 and EPYC Embedded 8434P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron E3300 and EPYC Embedded 8434P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3300 and EPYC Embedded 8434P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3300 and EPYC Embedded 8434P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3300 and EPYC Embedded 8434P.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data96

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2009 1 October 2024
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 2 96
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 200 Watt

Celeron E3300 has 207.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 8434P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron E3300 and EPYC Embedded 8434P. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron E3300 is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 8434P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3300 and EPYC Embedded 8434P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3300
Celeron E3300
AMD EPYC Embedded 8434P
EPYC Embedded 8434P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 178 votes

Rate Celeron E3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 8434P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E3300 or EPYC Embedded 8434P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.