Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Celeron E1500

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E1500 and Ryzen 9 7940HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiencyno data51.73
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release dateNovember 2008 (16 years ago)January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$63no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1500 and Ryzen 9 7940HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed2.2 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die size77 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Number of transistors105 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1500 and Ryzen 9 7940HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FP8
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1500 and Ryzen 9 7940HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron E1500 and Ryzen 9 7940HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1500 and Ryzen 9 7940HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1500 and Ryzen 9 7940HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E1500 and Ryzen 9 7940HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E1500 626
Ryzen 9 7940HS 30391
+4755%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 9 7940HS has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 1525% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron E1500 and Ryzen 9 7940HS. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron E1500 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 9 7940HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1500 and Ryzen 9 7940HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1500
Celeron E1500
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
Ryzen 9 7940HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 48 votes

Rate Celeron E1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 997 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E1500 or Ryzen 9 7940HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.