EPYC 7601 vs Celeron E1500

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E1500 and EPYC 7601 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated248
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.63
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data11.28
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Naples (2017−2018)
Release dateNovember 2008 (16 years ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$63$4,200

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1500 and EPYC 7601 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (shared)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size77 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1500 and EPYC 7601 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketLGA775TR4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1500 and EPYC 7601. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron E1500 and EPYC 7601 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1500 and EPYC 7601 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1500 and EPYC 7601. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data170.671 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E1500 and EPYC 7601.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E1500 626
EPYC 7601 34079
+5344%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 180 Watt

Celeron E1500 has 176.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7601, on the other hand, has 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron E1500 and EPYC 7601. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron E1500 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7601 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1500 and EPYC 7601, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1500
Celeron E1500
AMD EPYC 7601
EPYC 7601

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 48 votes

Rate Celeron E1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 24 votes

Rate EPYC 7601 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E1500 or EPYC 7601, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.