Xeon Silver 4510 vs Celeron E1400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E1400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.46
Xeon Silver 4510
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 150 Watt
21.51
+4576%

Xeon Silver 4510 outperforms Celeron E1400 by a whopping 4576% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E1400 and Xeon Silver 4510 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2920247
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data100.00
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.6713.57
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release dateApril 2008 (16 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$57$563

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1400 and Xeon Silver 4510 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (shared)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size77 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1400 and Xeon Silver 4510 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA775FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1400 and Xeon Silver 4510. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron E1400 and Xeon Silver 4510 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1400 and Xeon Silver 4510 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1400 and Xeon Silver 4510. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC)
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E1400 and Xeon Silver 4510.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E1400 0.46
Xeon Silver 4510 21.51
+4576%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E1400 735
Xeon Silver 4510 34170
+4549%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.46 21.51
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 150 Watt

Celeron E1400 has 130.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Silver 4510, on the other hand, has a 4576.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

The Xeon Silver 4510 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E1400 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron E1400 is a desktop processor while Xeon Silver 4510 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1400 and Xeon Silver 4510, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1400
Celeron E1400
Intel Xeon Silver 4510
Xeon Silver 4510

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 61 vote

Rate Celeron E1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Silver 4510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E1400 or Xeon Silver 4510, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.