Ryzen 7 5700U vs Celeron E1400
Primary details
Comparing Celeron E1400 and Ryzen 7 5700U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 719 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 26 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Lucienne (Zen 2, Ryzen 5000) |
| Architecture codename | Allendale (2006−2009) | Lucienne-U (Zen 2) |
| Release date | April 2008 (16 years ago) | 12 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $57 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron E1400 and Ryzen 7 5700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (shared) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 77 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 73 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 105 million | 9,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron E1400 and Ryzen 7 5700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 775 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1400 and Ryzen 7 5700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1400 and Ryzen 7 5700U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1400 and Ryzen 7 5700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E1400 and Ryzen 7 5700U.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 12 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 7 5700U outperforms Celeron E1400 by 2059% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Ryzen 7 5700U outperforms Celeron E1400 by 540% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Ryzen 7 5700U outperforms Celeron E1400 by 1293% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 7 5700U has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron E1400 and Ryzen 7 5700U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron E1400 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 5700U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1400 and Ryzen 7 5700U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
