A6-9220 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T3500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.80
A6-9220
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.80

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A6-9220 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26152612
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreBristol Ridge
Power efficiency2.165.05
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date26 September 2010 (14 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A6-9220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB160 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size107 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors410 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A6-9220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSocket P PGA478BGA
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10-15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A6-9220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A6-9220 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A6-9220 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A6-9220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 0.80
A6-9220 0.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1275
A6-9220 1278
+0.2%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 2063
A6-9220 2432
+17.9%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 4098
+4%
A6-9220 3941

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1760
A6-9220 2253
+28%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 38.5
A6-9220 27.71
+38.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 September 2010 1 June 2016
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

A6-9220 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A6-9220.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and A6-9220, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
AMD A6-9220
A6-9220

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 106 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 403 votes

Rate A6-9220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3500 or A6-9220, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.