Atom C3808 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1700
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Atom C3808 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2734 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 1.81 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| Release date | 7 December 2008 (15 years ago) | 15 August 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $369 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Atom C3808 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 22 |
| L1 cache | no data | 672 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 12 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 86 °C |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Atom C3808 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | PPGA478 | FCBGA1310 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Atom C3808. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Atom C3808 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Atom C3808 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Atom C3808. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4: 2133 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 34.134 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Atom C3808.
| PCIe version | no data | 3 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
| USB revision | no data | 3 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 16 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 16 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | 4x10/2.5/1 GBE |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 December 2008 | 15 August 2017 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Atom C3808 has an age advantage of 8 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Atom C3808. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is a notebook processor while Atom C3808 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Atom C3808, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
