Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1600 by a whopping 1837% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2792 | 666 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Power efficiency | 1.62 | 31.42 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 21 July 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.66 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 31 |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 9800 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.60 | 11.62 |
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 21 July 2020 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE has a 1836.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T1600 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
