Ryzen Threadripper 1956X vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Coreno data
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2no data
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data32768 KB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataSP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 12
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 has 257.1% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 1956X, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1956X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1956X
Ryzen Threadripper 1956X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 6 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1956X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T1500 or Ryzen Threadripper 1956X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.