Ryzen Threadripper 1956X vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | no data |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 32768 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | SP3r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 Watt |
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 has 257.1% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 1956X, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1956X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
