Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2977 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Power efficiency | 1.16 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Merom-2M (2008) | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 4 June 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 36 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 3 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | P | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XDNA 2 NPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 4 June 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 has 57.1% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
